SCARED
Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED)
The SCARED is a questionnaire completed by the parent to screen for anxiety symptoms in their child or adolescent. The parent rates their child's behavior over the past 3 months in order to identify different anxiety disorders: panic disorder, generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, social phobia, and anxiety-based school refusal.
- Number of questions
- 41 questions
- Estimated duration
- 10 minutes
- Language
- English
- Original name
- Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders
- Target audience
- Children & adolescents (ages 9 to 18)
- Authors
- Birmaher B., Khetarpal S., Cully M., Brent D., McKenzie S. (1997)
Preview of the 41 questions
Scoring & interpretation
Each item is rated on a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (Not True or Hardly Ever True), 1 (Somewhat True or Sometimes True), and 2 (Very True or Often True). Adding up the scores yields a total score (0-82) and five subscores corresponding to the clinical dimensions assessed.
Total score
- ≥ 25: possible presence of an anxiety disorder
- ≥ 30: more specific indication of an anxiety disorder
Subscales and clinical cutoffs
- Panic disorder / somatic symptoms (13 items): cutoff ≥ 7
- Generalized anxiety (9 items): cutoff ≥ 9
- Separation anxiety (8 items): cutoff ≥ 5
- Social phobia (7 items): cutoff ≥ 8
- Anxiety-based school refusal (4 items): cutoff ≥ 3
A subscore that exceeds its cutoff points toward the corresponding disorder. These cutoffs are indicative and do not replace a clinical assessment: they serve to guide the interview and the diagnostic process.
Usage
This tool isn't available on Mentaal. To use this questionnaire in your practice, you need a valid license. We invite you to send it directly from the publisher's website.
Available alternatives
What psychologists think
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate this questionnaire.
Clarity and comprehension
—Are the test's instructions and questions easy for patients to understand?
Clinical relevance
—Does the test measure what it's meant to measure, and is it useful in a clinical setting?
Perceived reliability of the results
—Do the results seem reliable and consistent in their interpretation?